I have, in the past, been something of a fan of Catherine Deveny. When she started to write opinion columns, I thought she was about the most interesting writer the Age had. I follow her on Twitter (more of the later) and generally read most things she does.
There is a place for a populist, self-aware, articulate person to write opinion pieces that get people talking, positively or not. The right wing have a bunch of people like that – see Andrew Bolt. The left wing, being an earnest, dour bunch, don’t so much.
The thing is, over the last 12 months she has become less the Age’s answer to Andrew Bolt, and more the Age’s answer to Sam Newman. She’s rude, crude, totally lacking in any empathy for anyone who sits outside her world-view even slightly (see her articles about Chadstone, and others), and her “wit” is vastly over-rated, when compared to similar writers like Marieke Hardy.
Her comments about Bindi Irwin were totally offensive, and her defence about being taken out of context on twitter shows a total lack of understanding of the medium. Twitter is a public medium, not a private chat with her friends.
And no, this is not an issue of freedom of speech. She is perfectly free to say whatever she wants to on twitter or elsewhere, but if she chooses to use that freedom to say offensive, objectionable things then she ought to expect that people will be offended and object.
And she ought to expect that The Age no longer want to be associated with her opinions.
Running
14 point something kms yesterday morning and 16km this morning. This morning’s felt harder, and I thought at the time maybe I was getting tired, but it turns out I was just running a bit faster.
Recent Comments